There are some real scum out there in the academic field who will try to debunk bona fide scientific work and research by calling them Ambiguous Groups, as if to label their years of research as anomalies or flukes? As if such research by a few scientific groups, which have repeatable results are not worthy of academic thought. Beware of anyone who calls a top scientific university or research group an Ambiguous Group only to purport their version of some theory. And if someone attempts to debunk in this way, ask them straight up to state their case and theory, as this maybe a clear indication of their true motives. Recently some scoundrel attempted such a debunking in an online think tank and stated: If we lend ourselves to blindly accept whatever conclusions are handed out by ambiguous groups, how does this affect our abilities to rationalizing our own beliefs? When this person was unable to produce a theory or even utter word one of any sort of opposite conclusion, I had to lay down the letter of the law; With all due respect and total consideration of your feelings on this subject and your beliefs; I think you are full of sh_t. Lets show the academic fraudsters and debunkers of true research and science the door once and for all. We should not have to put up with the bull crap they purport or listen to their half-baked BS claims without any research of their own to back them up. Bull Sh-t walks and it must continue to in the world of science otherwise we risk the future of mankind and the forward progression of the species. The only thing Ambiguous is the BS that these fraudsters purport. Consider this in 2006. |
